Recent Posts
Archives
- February 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (5)
- December 2009 (1)
- November 2009 (1)
- October 2009 (2)
- August 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (1)
- October 2008 (1)
- September 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (2)
- July 2008 (2)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (3)
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (1)
- January 2008 (2)
- December 2007 (3)
- November 2007 (4)
- October 2007 (8)
- September 2007 (5)
- August 2007 (9)
- July 2007 (5)
- June 2007 (6)
- May 2007 (11)
- April 2007 (7)
- March 2007 (11)
Tags
Search engine roundup
Published by Jennifer | Filed under Post
I’m always interested when new search engines are released. Not because I use them (it’s the boring choice, I know, but Google really does tend to meet my search needs better than the alternatives), but it is nice to see the ways people are trying to manipulate the area. There are some really interesting and inventive search engines being produced now – the focus seems to be more on highlighting the difference and niche aspects of different search engines, rather than trying to produce a GoogleClone.
Chipwrapper is a Google custom search engine encompassing the major UK broadsheets. It isn’t new I understand, but as I hadn’t seen it before, I thought I’d pass it on anyway. It searches across The Daily Express, Daily Mail, Daily Mirror, Financial Times, The Guardian, The Independent, The Sun, The Telegraph and The Times, and is actually pretty successful at finding articles that the newspapers own search engines fail at turning up. I’ve not spent a lot of time investigating custom search engines, but this is a pretty cool use for them, and I’ve found that I’ve used it a fair bit since I found it.
FuzzFind is a combined search engine that searches across Google, Yahoo, MSN Live and del.icio.us. You can then choose the weighting you want to give a particular search engine, which is actually pretty neat. By heavily weighting del.icio.us in particular, you get access to links that otherwise probably wouldn’t have come up. It shows you what ranking a particular response has in each search engine, as well as how many times the url has been bookmarked on del.icio.us, which could be quite useful.
Wikia is the search engine brainchild of Wikipedia’s Jimmy Wales. It is self-statedly imperfect at the moment – results appear erratic and almost unsorted. The idea behind it being that user-moderated results will ultimately be more useful than those generated purely by algorithm. It isn’t brilliant yet though. The first hit when you search for ‘apple’ is the QuickTime download page, which, whilst close, isn’t quite right. More uncommon queries don’t get you anywhere just yet – the first hit for ‘European Court of Justice’ is to an article about the Protection of Fundamental Rights in the European Community, which is probably not what you’re actually after. It’s an ambitious concept though, and I’m curious to see how it turns out. I expect, given the collaborative nature of it, that commonly searched for terms will probably end up being fine, but that more complicated searches will never really work on it. It reminds me quite a bit of Maholo, which never particularly interested me either, but Wikia functions more as a wiki than a portal.
I’m curious to know if anyone else really uses other search engines on a day to day basis. Tools like this are great, and it’s really handy to know that they’re there, but I tend not to use anything other than Google. Does anyone have any suggestions for search engines that they absolutely couldn’t do without?











March 5th, 2008 at 4:04 am
It’s always good when new Search Engines are released. Something needs to come along to give Google a good run for the competition. Google has way to much of the market share!