Recent Posts
Archives
- February 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (5)
- December 2009 (1)
- November 2009 (1)
- October 2009 (2)
- August 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (1)
- October 2008 (1)
- September 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (2)
- July 2008 (2)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (3)
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (1)
- January 2008 (2)
- December 2007 (3)
- November 2007 (4)
- October 2007 (8)
- September 2007 (5)
- August 2007 (9)
- July 2007 (5)
- June 2007 (6)
- May 2007 (11)
- April 2007 (7)
- March 2007 (11)
Tags
BIALL
blog action day
blogging
books
conference
cool stuff
del.icio.us
directory
environment
facebook
FT
google
information architecture
information overload
interesting things
law
law library
libraries
library 2.0
links
maps
mashups
meme
meta
networks
new blog
news
podcasts
professional
professional development
random
rant
RSS
search
social networking
tech
twitbin
twitter
user experience
web 2.0
web apps
welcome
wikis
work
work life balance
Podcasts from Sweet & Maxwell
Published by Davina | Filed under Uncategorized
I was on the Sweet & Maxwell website today and noticed that they now have a podcast section. They have a number available on topics such as Employment Law, IP Law and Family Law.
I’m not a podcast person, and I don’t know if any of my lawyers are, but they look like useful things to link to on the intranet in case there is anyone interested.
What I’d really like to know is how many hits they’re getting on them? Are there actually lawyers using them?
August 30th, 2007











August 30th, 2007 at 3:37 pm
Seshat, I like what Sweet & Maxwell are doing here but it’s a bit of a mish mash. Some of the podcasts are about legal subjects whilst some are about how the authors wrote the books they are working on. There doesn’t seem to be any consistency in what S&M are providing!
August 30th, 2007 at 4:30 pm
Yes, there does seem to be a distint lack of consistency there. I wonder if they’ve done any user testing or gotten much feedback?
I think that if they’re going to have podcasts on writing books etc rather than simply legal topics, they should be kept in separate sections.